who is alex orbison dating - Obama plan mandating health insurance

Similarly, the difference between being insured versus uninsured appears to be marginal to the healthy person with an infrequent need for care—though going without health insurance can turn out to be a bad bet if a major illness or accident strikes.That leads us to the crucial, practical question that this academic debate largely misses: Who are the people that would no longer have health insurance if the mandate penalty were repealed?

At a debate in South Carolina, Edwards said Obama's plan really wasn't universal health care, since it didn't have a mandate to ensure everyone was covered.

Obama replied that his plan universal (a claim we rated Barely True ) and explained why he was against a mandate: "A mandate means that in some fashion, everybody will be forced to buy health insurance. But I believe the problem is not that folks are trying to avoid getting health care. And that's why my plan emphasizes lowering costs." Obama said at the time it was possible some people would refuse to buy health care under his plan.

In response, University of Chicago economists Casey Mulligan and Tomas Philipson argued that research on the connection between insurance coverage and mortality has found no more than a weak linkage between the two.

They note that part of the explanation may be “that lack of coverage does not necessarily imply lack of lifesaving care as hospitals cannot turn away emergency-care patients without coverage.” Summers, joined by Professor Jonathan Gruber of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, a prominent “architect” of Obamacare, then fired back,doubling-down on Summers’ original claim.

At one level, this is a classic argument among academics—complete with each side accusing the other of basing its case on a “selective” use of evidence in the professional literature. To start with, a recent review of the academic literature on the subject finds a mixed bag, but with the strongest link between coverage and health outcomes in cases where health insurance coverage improves access to care, “particularly among people with lower incomes and chronic conditions.” That makes sense.

Having health insurance makes less of a difference to people with higher incomes who can afford to pay for more of their medical care directly.Of that number, CBO estimates that 5 million fewer people will be enrolled in individual market coverage; 5 million fewer in Medicaid; and more than 2 million fewer in employer group coverage.Notice what CBO is and because, especially in the non-group market, the resulting increases in premiums would cause more people to not purchase insurance.” This is a crucial point."Do you believe that each individual American should be required to have health insurance? "Hillary Clinton's attacking, but what's she not telling you about her health care plan?It forces everyone to buy insurance, even if you can't afford it, and you pay a penalty if you don't," said one of his television ads .Achieving this will require the elimination of costly federal rules that artificially drive up health insurance premiums; for instance, current mandates on what insurance plans must cover drive up prices for all, even those who would want a more limited health insurance plan.

Tags: , ,